Ben & Jerry’s has accused its parent group, Unilever, of sacking the ice-cream brand’s chief executive for refusing to “oversee the dismantling” of its progressive values.

The US-based brand said in a court filing that David Stever, who led the company for almost two years, was “removed” from his post earlier this month. He has been with Ben & Jerry’s since joining as a tour guide in 1988.

Ben & Jerry’s alleged in a filing to the US District Court for the Southern District of New York that Unilever, the UK-based consumer group that owns brands including Marmite and Dove, wanted to stop the boss making political statements.

Anuradha Mittal, the chair of Ben & Jerry’s independent board, said: “Dave has courageously advanced the company’s social mission and values, has continued to drive innovation in its super premium product range, and has delivered strong financial results, far outpacing the rest of Unilever’s ice-cream business.

“What Dave hasn’t done is what Unilever would like him to do, which is to oversee the dismantling of Ben & Jerry’s mission, progressive values.”

The court action is the latest episode in a testy relationship between the ice-cream brand and its owner, which ousted its own chief executive, Hein Schumacher, last month and replaced him with its finance chief, Fernando Fernandez, to speed up the company’s turnaround.

Last month, Ben & Jerry’s accused Unilever of demanding that it stop publicly criticising Donald Trump.

In November, Ben & Jerry’s launched legal action against Unilever, accusing its parent company of trying to block the ice-cream brand from making public statements supporting Palestinian refugees in the conflict in Gaza.

It said Unilever had breached the terms of a confidential settlement agreed in 2022 after a clash over plans to stop selling its products in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

Ben & Jerry’s, which was founded by Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield in 1978, was bought by the UK-based consumer goods group in 2000.

As part of the merger deal, an independent board was set up to protect the ice-cream brand’s mission and strong stance on social issues.

Mittal also accused Unilever of wanted to dismantle that agreement, which he said had “protected Ben & Jerry’s position as a wholly owned autonomous subsidiary, the very things that have created the company’s financial success and incredible brand loyalty among its fans. That is why the independent board has sued Unilever and why Unilever is seeking to punish the chief executive.”

The court filing said: “Unilever has repeatedly threatened Ben & Jerry’s personnel, including CEO David Stever, should they fail to comply with Unilever’s efforts to silence the social mission.”

“On 3 March 2025, Unilever informed the independent board that they were removing and replacing Mr Stever as Ben & Jerry’s CEO.”

The two parties have had a series of disputes in recent years, with particular tensions over Ben & Jerry’s move to halt sales in the West Bank in 2021. Unilever blocked the attempts but was then sued by Ben & Jerry’s.

The latest row comes after Unilever announced plans to list its ice-cream business on the Amsterdam stock exchange.

The listing will separate a division that makes five of the world’s top-selling 10 ice-cream brands, including Wall’s, Magnum and Ben & Jerry’s. It also makes Cornetto, Viennetta, Carte d’Or and Breyers, which is big in the US.

Unilever has been contacted for comment.